|
Mind the Gap
The lack of digital know-how at the top limits both
newsrooms and classrooms
by Deborah Potter
The message is familiar to anyone who’s ridden the London Underground,
but the warning to “mind the gap” doesn’t just
apply to trains and platforms any more. It’s also a useful
reminder to journalists and educators of a certain age: Beware the
growing knowledge gap in newsrooms and classrooms.
It hit me this spring, as I was leading a workshop for the Illinois
Broadcast News Association. When I asked how many in the room use
the instant-messaging service Twitter.com on the job, only two hands
went up. Most of the 100-plus people in attendance had no clue what
I was talking about.
Web producer Patrick O’Brien, then at KTVI-TV in St. Louis,
says he was surprised to find that he and his girlfriend were the
only Twitter-heads in the group. He’s used it to share news
content, find story ideas and get a heads-up on breaking news, including
the earthquakes in the Midwest earlier this year.
"
I woke up the morning of the earthquake not knowing what
had happened, scrolled through several tweets discussing what they
were doing when
they felt it,” Patrick told me later via email. “Then
I turned on the TV to see what was going on, and they just started
mentioning the quake, although the tweets were on it 10 minutes earlier.”
To those of us who started in the news business more than 35 years
ago, “tweet” sounds like something out of Looney Tunes.
Do we really need to know about this stuff? After all, we’ve
seen so many dramatic changes already:
| THEN |
NOW |
| Manual typewriters |
Laptop computers |
| Film chains |
Digital video |
| Wite-Out® |
Delete key |
| Pay phones |
Smart phones |
| Three networks |
100+ channels |
Heck, when I tell 20-somethings how my newsroom operated back
then, they think I was living in some previous century. Oh, right.
I was.
The trouble is that so many of us are still leading last-century
lives at work. We’re online but we’re not really plugged
in, unlike the “kids” we’re teaching, hiring
and managing. And this lack of digital literacy at the leadership
level is hurting both newsrooms and classrooms, by limiting the
vision of what’s possible. As Yogi Berra once said, “If
you don’t know where you’re going, you might not get
there.”
It’s time to start closing the gap. But how?
Howard Owens has a
few good ideas. He’s director of digital
publishing for GateHouse Media, a newspaper company, and author
of the provocative blog HowardOwens.com. In addition to suggesting
that “non-wired” journalists learn to Twitter, he has
these recommendations:
- Start using RSS
- Join a social network
- Become a blogger
- Make digital photos and video and post them online
- Create a Google Map mashup
If that sounds overwhelming, it shouldn’t. Most of it takes
virtually no technical knowledge and only as much time as you want
to invest. And it’s worth the trouble, for lots of reasons.
Why bother with RSS (Really Simple Syndication)? Because it’s
a quick, painless way of staying on top of the news, or the latest
developments in journalism education, which you have to do anyway.
All you need is a free account with Google or Yahoo! to set up
a “reader” that monitors RSS feeds from Internet sites
you select. Because it’s a Web-based system, it’s
easy to check for updates anywhere, any time. And that helps
you as
a leader stay ahead of--or at least keep pace with--the troops.
Why join a social network? Because it’s useful for building
connections, finding sources and getting free advice. WNBC-TV “tech
guru” and dean of student affairs at Columbia University’s
journalism school Sree Sreenivasan recommends LinkedIn as an indispensable
tool for journalists, so that’s the one I joined. At first,
I was skeptical. Sure, it was fun tracking down former colleagues
and finding out what they’d been up to, but what exactly
was the point? Six months later, I got it. LinkedIn doesn’t
just connect you to people directly, it connects you indirectly.
A contact list with 300 names links you to more than a million
professionals with a wide range of expertise that you can tap
into with the click of a mouse. Definitely worth it.
If you expect your students and staff to post to the Web, you
should do it too. A blog is one of the easiest ways to put
content online.
Just sign up with WordPress or Blogger, both free services
with simple, step-by-step directions for setting up your own
blog.
(No one has to know you’re doing this, by the way, unless
you want them to.)
“One reason for writing a blog — it improves your writing,” says
Chris
Cobler, editor of the Victoria (Texas) Advocate, who’s
been blogging since 2003 and says it helps him write more conversationally
and shorter. “Here’s a second reason that’s
just as important: Blogging helps you better understand your
audience.
The hallmark of any blog is the ability for readers to post
comments to what you write. By having this regular conversation
with readers,
you learn what hits and what misses.” So what journalist
or educator can afford not to blog in today’s media world?
Because the Web at its best is so much more than a repository
for text, you also need to know how to post photos, video and
audio.
Finding source material shouldn’t be a challenge for
anyone in electronic news. Just follow the instructions to
post a digital
photo on your new blog. To post video, the simplest approach
is to create a free account with YouTube and follow the instructions.
We’ve almost exhausted Howard Owens’ list. His final
suggestion, to create a Google Map mash-up, is actually fairly
complicated. A true mash-up that links a data set to an online
map requires working with developer-level code. But building a
basic Google map with location markers--places you’ve
worked, for example--is simple enough, and you can embed the
map in your
blog as well.
The Owens list is just a starting point. Tom Cheredar of NewAssignment.net
has his own list of “silly
Web applications” that belong
in a journalist’s tool box. Summize–a search engine
that collects Twitter updates–is tops on his list. He also
recommends Twellow.com, another Twitter-based service, that creates
a directory of people by profession, ranked by number of “followers.”
Notice that none of this stuff involves learning a new language
like HTML or CSS. If you want to go there, be my guest. Your
staff and students may be way ahead of you. Newbie reporter
Shannan Bowen,
for instance, has a to-do
list that includes learning Arcview,
a computer mapping program, refreshing her statistics knowledge
and producing more multimedia. Bowen’s been out of college
less than two years and works for a small paper in North Carolina,
the Wilmington Star-News.
It’s both inspiring and a little intimidating to read Bowen’s
personal blog, where she shares her plans for “getting on
track.” “It seems like I’m always working on
something,” she writes. “If I’m not working for
the paper, I’m working on learning new things and, well,
just being a journalism nerd.” Bowen wants to master Flash,
Python, Django, MySQL, Perl and PHP. And she intends to brush up
on skills she learned in school, like using FinalCut Pro. That
may not all be necessary, but Bowen clearly believes it’s
worth the effort to be prepared for whatever the future might
bring.
It’s almost impossible to predict what that will be.
When I started out stripping wire machines and distributing
rolls
of copy around the newsroom, I certainly never envisioned anything
like iNews or ENPS. Smart people who think they know best are
often
wrong.
Darryl F. Zanuck, for example, the head of the 20th Century
Fox movie studio back in the 1940s, didn’t see any kind of future
for the new kid on the block: television. “It won't be able
to hold on to any market it captures after six months,” he
said. “People will soon get tired of staring at a plywood
box every night.”
But while it’s risky to make predictions, we can make some
educated guesses. The future is going to be wireless and broadband.
The future will include mobile devices that marry the portability
of a Smartphone with the capability of a laptop. The future will
allow people to be connected to media anytime, anywhere. In fact,
we’re almost there already.
If we’re ever going to figure out how journalism can survive
in this ocean of information, we first need to know how to stay
afloat. Leaders who get their feet wet are in a better position
to imagine the future and prepare young journalists for what might
come next. There’s nothing charming or inspiring about a
boss who’s a Luddite. It’s time to take the plunge.
Author Posting. (c) Deborah Potter, 2008.
This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by
permission of Deborah Potter for personal use, not for redistribution.
The definitive version was published in Electronic News, Volume
2 Issue 4, October 2008.
doi:10.1080/19312430802418105
|